Clarabelle Chui Jia Yan Effective
Communication 16SSB012D
In the news release, “Trains on the
North-South and East West Lines Safe for Service”, Land Transport Authority
(LTA) (2016) addressed the problems that it faced in regards to the
North-South and East-West lines trains. It has also included the actions taken
to resolve the problems and how trains were subjected to tests to assure the
public on their safety and reliability. The webpage also mentioned the problems
that were found on trains. These included a “battery housing” that flew open
due to pressure. However, it was rectified immediately by the manufacturer.
Other than that, cracks on five of the trains’ draughtscreens due to
installation errors and hairline cracks on “car-body shell” were also found.
Nonetheless, operation of train services was not affected as these trains were
tested to be safe for use. As it was impossible to repair the hairline cracks,
affected trains that were under warranty were returned back for replacement of
components. With a view to complete the rectification programme, LTA expressed
that they would send back trains in pairs at a time for servicing.
Nevertheless, this is dependent on the arrival of new trains along with the
current ones which are still undergoing re-signalling so as to ensure there are
sufficient trains for running. In order to ensure the safety and efficiency of
the services, LTA has concluded that they would work closely with the
contractors and SMRT. Based on the points elaborated, although LTA makes
every effort to ensure the safety and efficiency of the trains, they could have
followed a more standardized procedure in informing the public.
First of all, LTA should have reported
this matter in a timelier manner to the public in regards to the hairline
cracks. Based on LTA’s webpage, the news was released on Jul 2016. However, the
train defects were found in 2013 but were not reported immediately. Spykerman
(2016) stated that a spokesman from the Ministry of Transport stated that the
hairline cracks were not made public because the cracks did not pose any safety
risks to commuters. In my opinion, since the
cracks did not pose any safety risks to commuters, there is no reason to why LTA
had to hide this information from the public. It might have been worried about
causing unnecessary commotion over such small matters. However, the public may
have thought otherwise in such a way that LTA was trying to cover up their
mistakes. Based on the article “Rise in
major breakdowns but MRT gets more reliable: LTA” (2016), train breakdowns are
increasing in Singapore. With this being said, commuters were already losing
faith in the train transport system. With the actions of LTA not reporting the
hairline cracks on time, commuters would definitely feel deceived, especially
when the public got to know the news through a Hong Kong news agency and not
from LTA itself. This point can be further supported in the news release “Hairline
cracks found on 11 Sengkang-Punggol LRT Trains.” (2016).
Secondly, a more
detailed report should have been published to explain about the replacing of
the train body. It was mentioned that the hairline cracks did not pose any
safety problems. However, it does not fully justify why the trains needed to be
replaced. In the article ‘China
manufacturer for MTR secretly recalls 35 SMRT subway train after cracks found.” (2016), a retired
Singaporean subway staff stated: “I’ve never encountered a situation like this
in all my decades of working in railway construction. Replacing the whole frame
[of the train] - you can tell how serious [the problem] is.”. Through this
statement, it is clear that the situation that had happened was considered
grave. LTA should have published a more detailed report stating the reasons the
trains were being sent back to China for replacements of car body. As the report was published, many commuters
have felt betrayed by LTA. This is because they stated that the hairline cracks did not
pose any safety problems yet it needs to be replaced.
Lastly, LTA should
ensure in the future that the information regarding quality checks is conveyed
clearly to the public. In the article “LTA says train defects “not
safety-critical” but ex-HK CEO says QC of entire manufacturing process under
suspicion.”, (2016), it was stated
that former Hong Kong’s Kowloon-Canton Railway Corporation acting CEO agreed
that the quality control standard for Singapore trains was mediocre thus
resulting in cracks and battery problems. With this being said, if LTA does not
convey a clear message to the public regarding the quality checks, the public
may easily be influenced by other reporting sources. With LTA being clear and
concise in reporting about quality checks, commuters will have an ease of mind
knowing about the conditions.
Although LTA did
execute various actions to correct the problems, it was insufficient due to the
late and incomplete reporting. They should improve on their current standard
and the way they convey the messages to the public.
References
China manufacturer for MTR secretly recalls 35 SMRT
subway train after cracks found. (2016). FactWire. Retrieved,
September 24, 2016 from https://www.factwire.news/en/MTR-securetly-recall.html
Hairline
cracks found on 11 Sengkang-Punggol LRT Trains. (2016). Todayonline. Retreived, October 17, 2016 from http://www.todayonline.com/chinaindia/china/factwire-defends-reporting-takes-issue-khaws-comments-smrt-train-defects
LTA says train defects “not safety-critical” but ex-HK CEO
says QC of entire manufacturing process under suspicion. (2016). TheIndependent. Retrieved,
September 24, 2016 from http://theindependent.sg/lta-says-train-defects-not-safety-critical-but-ex-hk-ceo-says-qc-of-entire-manufacturing-process-under-suspicion/
Singapore Land Transport
Authority. (2016). Trains
on the North-South and East West Lines Safe for Service. Retrieved,
September 20, 2016, from https://www.lta.gov.sg/apps/news/page.aspx?c=2&id=0f8b1220-0289-4bef-99c9-b2455f17a66c#_ftn1
Spykerman, K. (2016). Lessons to be learnt from defective SMRT
trains incident: Khaw. Channelnewsasia.
Retrieved from http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/lessons-to-be-learnt-from/3048928.html
Retrieved from http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/lessons-to-be-learnt-from/3048928.html
Tan, C. (2016) Rise
in major breakdowns but MRT gets more reliable: LTA. The Straits Times. Retrieved, September
25, 2016 from http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/transport/rise-in-major-breakdowns-but-mrt-gets-more-reliable-lta